Optimum Design of Pump Intake using CFD for Improving Hydraulic Performance

Elzahry Farouk Elzahry, Ashraf Ghanem


A new El-Tabiya pumping station in Alexandria Governorate is considered in this work. The station consists of six axial pumping units. The old station is replaced by a new one and the old sump is reused. Pump operation depends not only on the efficiency of the pumping units but also on the proper design of the intake sump. Intake sumps receive water flowing from the intake channel and must direct it smoothly to the pump suction opening. If suction sumps are improperly shaped or sized, air-entraining vortexes or submerged vortexes are developed. The flow conditions at an entry to a pump depending upon flow conditions in approach channel, the various site-specific geometrical and hydraulic constraints, the location of pump intake with respect to the walls, velocity changes and obstructions such as piers, screens, etc., and rotational tendencies inflow produced upstream of the pump bays. The time and cost involved in-sump model studies for the design of sump geometry can be reduced to a large extent through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) studies as the flow parameters can be predicted at the pump inlet with the change in geometry without actual running of the pump with CFD. Hence the design of the sump can be optimized to keep the flow parameters below limiting values. This study attempts to model the flow characteristic in a pump sump, minimize the swirl angles, increase the flow at the pump inlet and keep the flow parameters below limiting values. The numerical study carried out in this paper aims at optimizing the overall fluid flow in a pump intake by the use of a commercially available CFD code. CFD study was carried out on initial sump geometry and initial CFD results were analyzed.


CFD; Design; Hydraulic; Pump intake; Vortexes.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 270 times
PDF - 227 times

Full Text:



S. A. Shabayek, Improving approach flow hydraulics at pump intakes, International Journal of Civil and Engineering, IJCEE-IJENS, 10(6), 2010.

S. M. Borghei and A.R. Kabiri-Samani, Effect of anti-vortex plates on critical submergence at a vertical intake, Transaction A: Civil Engineering, 17(2), 89, 2010.

Hydraulic Institute, American National Standard for Pump Intake Design, Parsippany, NJ: Hydraulic Institute, 1998.

H. -X. Chen and J. –H, Guo, Numerical simulation of 3-D turbulent flow in the multi-intakes sump of the pump station, Journal of Hydrodynamics: Series B, 19, 42-47, 2007.

M. Tagomori and M. Gotoch, Flow patterns and vortices in pump-sumps, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Large Hydraulic Machinery, Beijing, 1989, pp. 13-22.

I. Takata, Y. Kawata, T. Kobayashi and Y. Morinishi, Large-eddy simulation of unsteady turbulent swirl flow in a pump intake, Proceedings of the 1st European Computational Fluid Dynamic Conference, Brussels, 1992, pp. 255-261.

J. Matsui, K. Kamemoto and T. Okamura, CFD benchmark and a model experiment on the flow in pump sump, Proceedings of the 23rd IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Yokohama, 2006, pp. 1(10)-(16).

M. Tagomori and M. Gotoch, Flow patterns and vortices in pump-sumps, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Large Hydraulic Machinery, Beijing, 1989, pp. 28-31.

W. L. Chuang and S. C. Hsiao, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of intake model with crossflow, Journal of Hydrodynamics, Series B, 23(3), 314-324, 2011.

T. S. Desmukh and V. K. Gahlot, Numerical study of flow behavior in a multiple intake pump sump, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, 2, 118-128, 2011.

M. C. M. Leong and P. B. Clark, CFD modeling of pump sumps, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Water and Wastewater Pumping Stations, Cranfield, 2008, pp. 71-80.

C. Lucino and S. L. Gonzalo Duró, Vortex detection in pump sumps by means of CFD, XXIV Latin American Congress on Hydraulics, Punta del Este, 2010.

S. N. Shukla and J. T. Kshirsagar, Numerical prediction of air entrainment in pump intakes, Proceedings of the 24th International Pump Users Symposium, Texas, 2008, pp. 29-33.


  • There are currently no refbacks.